After hearing it was a hoax I immediately figured that this was an attempt to gain publicity by the artist, as pointed out in the Your Say message box below that article:
"Sarah,
I think you and many others are guilty of being rather naïve in falling for this story.
What you have is an Artist seeking self promotion by using one of the oldest tricks in the book, exploiting our sentimentality for cruelty against animals.
It's been done before and no doubt will be done again. The internet ensures these hoaxes travel much further and quicker than before.
Now this Artist has raised his profile and ensured his work is more bankable I wonder if he will use his new found wealth to tackle the human suffering he would accuse us of ignoring or fatten his own bank account."
I dont see the discussion merits being locked because it has not caused a fury here and all sides are welcome to an opinion.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote


