[Miskellaneous]

I think the first link looks miles better in the fact its clean, neutral colour scheme, crisp photos, no pixelation on the text (the sheffield site, the main logo that says 'sheffield cleaning pro' looks really bad, you can see it has a grey background, not black and the text is totally pixelated) and in general looks 100x more professional. Just my opinion, I wouldn't be at all tempted to use the sheffield cleaning pro one. Hope this helps

[Arleigh]

Yes I agree. The design of honest carpet care looks more related to the theme of the site. I like its design better...

Originally Posted by teotrad

Honest carpet care looks more professional.

[Shaun_A]

I designed honestcarpetcare sheffieldcleaning was a web designer although he does know his SEO stuff.

But hey what do we know it's the general public that use the sites and they decide, sometimes you have to be out of it to make a better decission.

Shaun

[Mooij603]

hmmm...strange, I would also have said Carpet Cleaning Sheffield...Looks far more professional, other than is messy and unattractive.

[nass]

just from a page point of view, the sheffieldcleaning page looks to me like a page showing the service with no salesy pitch, honestcarpetcare looks to me like someone using too much sales hype. Sounds silly doesn't it, but whilst one looks better and more professional, the other one just looks more "honest".

That said don't underestimate the effect of regionalising the offering too - having sheffield in the name and graphic will undoubtedly generate more sheffield interest

[Shipping Manager]

Cosmetic wise I prefer the first.

[Shaun_A]

A frind of mine from Brighton area has this site

http://www.naturalcarpetcare.co.uk/

what's your impressions of this?

Shaun

[Laurus Nobilis]

Both looks OK for me. But what is the point to have a two sites? Anyway, I like sheffieldcleaning more, I guess that this one should perform better because name, which is easy to remember, as wall as because of design.